Most Civil Surgeons are hard-pressed for time. www.easyIME.com is a portal that helps both applicants and Civil Surgeons to complete the process of the IME.
WHAT YOU CAN DO WITH EASYIME:
Civil Surgeons can now take full control of the manual procedures involved with the I-693 forms. A pdf format of the form can be printed backend, making it very easy for form submission. What’s more, when an applicant is referred to the Civil Surgeon through easyIME online there is pre-screening done and the details are sorted out, based on individual medical history. This leads to a lot of time saving for the Surgeon who is already pressed for time, so there can be more focus on the applicant.
easyIME helps Civil Surgeons by co-ordinating with the applicant and ensuring that the appointment flows smoothly!
Built-in system validation checks are in place as per CDC technical instructions, Civil Surgeons can now have anytime, anywhere access to patient information!
For over 150 years the U S Constitution was recognizing children born in the country as citizens, regardless of whether their parents were citizens or not.
But for the first time in the state of Texas, birth certificates were not being issued to those children born of undocumented parents. A civil rights lawsuit was also filed against the Texas Department that alleged discrimination on the basis of immigration.
A lawyer who was representing the women stated that the deluge of refusals for issuance of birth certificates began last year. “I’ve never seen such a large number of women with this problem. In the past someone might be turned away, but it was always resolved. This is something altogether new.”
According to the lawsuit the women who had requested birth certificates for their children in some counties were asked to go back, as they did not have sufficient proof of their identities. State law however allows the use of a foreign identification proof if the mother lacked a driver’s license issued in the state of Texas or even if she is armed with a US passport.
But the local officials told the women that they would no longer accept the photo IDs issued by a foreign country or a foreign passport without a current U S visa.
The Department of Homeland Security officials were commended for releasing hundreds of detained mothers on bond or with electronic monitoring ankle bracelets, and said that it was an important step towards ending the practice of detaining mothers and children.
But critics stated that the administration’s decision to release these people was not enough, the detention centers which were described by them as ‘jail-like’ should be closed permanently, they said. The detention centers have been in the centre of news recently, with many critics stating that the facilities in them were abysmal.
Members of the Congress stated they would not stop pressing the administration until immigration officers stop the detentions entirely.
“We remain strongly convinced that no family – regardless of status – should be housed in jail-like facilities for any length of time,” they said in a joint statement. Hundreds of detained mothers and children have been released by federal officers from the nation’s family detention centers as part of a promise to end long-term detention of migrant families.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials say the move is part of the Homeland Security Secretary’s plan to end a controversial long-term detention of migrant mothers and children who have demonstrated they have reason to fear persecution if returned to their home countries.
Many government lawyers worked hard last week to convince court judges to give permission to President Obama to go ahead with sweeping initiatives to protect immigrants in the country who have come in illegally. But the series of judges’ questions do not seem to make it very likely that the initiative programs undertaken by the President would start any time before the last months of his term, if at all.
A panel of judges of the Court of Appeals in the United States heard the arguments in a lawsuit by Texas and 25 other states; they challenged the executive actions of the President that would be giving temporary relaxations to over four million immigrants from deportation. What’s more, they would also be permitted to work. In February this year the programs were blocked by a federal district judge in the state of Texas. Two months later, the administration’s emergency request to cancel the order was denied by a panel of the Fifth Circuit.
Even more serious legal trouble was faced by the administration when it came to the Federal district judge of Texas. Officials of the government were criticized by him for failing to inform him that more than 100,000 deferrals with extended 3 year terms had been issued by them under the President’s programs to young immigrants. This was done before the injunction was imposed.
